| 
 Simpsons Actors Get Rich Kwik
 By Jouni Paakkinen (jouni@simpsonsarchive.com) - April 30, 2001
 The six principle voice actors behind The Simpsons are in for a raise 
        that's set to bring their combined income to roughly 32 million dollars over the next two seasons.
 According to a Variety report, Dan Castellaneta, 
        Hank Azaria, Harry Shearer, Yeardley Smith, Julie Kavner and Nancy Cartwright are now closing deals for $100,000 
        per episode salaries during the series' 13th and 14th seasons. The deal also includes a project development 
        agreement with Fox for Dan Castellaneta, who has co-written at least one Simpsons episode thus far with wife Deb Lacusta.
 Additionally, the syndication bonus of $1,000,000 each, originally promised to the actors in 
        2005 as part of their season 10-12 contracts, will instead be paid now according to the new contract terms. 
        The cast has also been guaranteed a $125,000 per episode salary should they elect to stay with the show for its 
        15th season, adding another 16 million to their combined earnings. (Combined figures are derived from a 22 episode 
        per season average.)
 Negotiations for this contract term reportedly were less caustic than  the former one's, during 
        which the actors threatened to leave the series if Fox failed to meet a $150,000 per episode salary stipulation. The 
        studio responded with rather unsuccessful casting calls to replace their roles. Said Harry Shearer of 
        the incident, A large number of working voiceover actors declined 
        Fox's invitation to replace us.
 Originally paid $25,000 per episode, the cast ultimately agreed to $50,000 per episode starting 
        with season 10, on the condition that the figure was raised by $10,000 each year until the next contract term.
 Source: Variety  (courtesy 
        Jonah Flynn)
 
 
        
        A Simpsons Spin-Off?
 By Jouni Paakkinen (jouni@simpsonsarchive.com) - April 11, 2001
 The Simpsons' creator Matt Groening revealed in an  
         interview that he is planning a Simpsons spin-off, featuring 
         the yellow family and everybody from the current show. However, the stories would revolve around the other 
         characters already present in the series.
 This is not the first idea for a spin-off Groening has developed. In 1994, he was working on a live-action 
         show, centered around Springfield's Krusty the Clown (starring Dan Castellaneta). Groening even had a pilot script ready, but 
         the negotiations with the network got stalled and eventually failed. Groening shelved the project and moved on to 
         developing Futurama.
 Time will tell whether this new spin-off will ever take off and become reality. Either way, ongoing 
         discussions on additional two or three seasons of The Simpsons suggest that our favorite family is not likely to 
         disappear from prime time in the near future.
 Source: The Knoxville News-Sentinel  (courtesy 
        Jukka Keskiaho)
 
 
        
        The Gospel According to the Simpsons
 By Jouni Paakkinen (jouni@simpsonsarchive.com) - February 20, 2001
 
  In the summer of 1999, Florida journalist Mark Pinsky faced a dilemma familar to many suburban, middle aged, 
        middle class parents. His children, aged 8 and 11, wanted to watch nightly re-runs of The Simpsons on their Orlando Fox affiliate.         
        All Pinsky, then 51, knew about the series was the reputation for negative and anti-authoritarian messages that created such a 
        furor during the show's first two regular seasons, when bad boy Bart was the narrative center of The Simpsons. Struggling to remain open-minded, Pinsky offered to watch the show with his son and daughter. The father was 
        pleasantly surprised by the moral messages embedded in the show, and the fact that most of the sexual innuendo went over their 
        heads. But Pinsky, a former staff writer for the Los Angeles Times now covering religion for the Orlando Sentinel, saw something 
       else: a vigorous and largely favorable presentation of God, faith and spirituality, which he found counter-intutitive to everything 
       the thought about The Simpsons. As he watched the episodes with his children -- sometimes 11 shows a week -- he reached for his 
       reporter's note pad and began furiously scribbling notes.
 In August of 1999, a Sunday essay appeared in the Sentinel, 
        entitled The Gospel According to Homer, which was widely reprinted around the United States. Letters and 
        e-mails came in, offering support for his thesis and suggesting other evidence. He discovered The Simpsons Archive and their 
        invaluable episode capsules, and decided to develop a proposal for a short book, along the lines of Robert Short's classic, 
        The Gospel According to Peanuts, 
        based on the comic strip. That book, Pinsky learned, had never been out of print since is was published in the mid-1960s, and 
        had sold 10 million copies.
 It took nearly a year to find a publisher, but in the end, it was Westminster John Knox, an arm of the 
        Presbyterian Church, that offered a contract. Ironically, this was the same house that published the Peanuts book.
 Pinsky said that, in the course of researching the book, the fans at The Simpsons Archive were of great help, 
        that the book could not have been written without them.
 I bombarded Jouni, Jordan, and others members with hundreds of e-mails, begging them for help in locating 
        obscure quotes and sequences, and they never let me down, Pinsky said in an interview. They also agreed to read part or all of 
        the manuscript for errors. I'm sure I will get some things wrong, Pinsky said, but I didn't want to offend 
        Simpsons' fans with too many careless errors.
 The Gospel According to the Simpsons: The Spiritual Life of World's Most Animated Family 
        is scheduled to be released in November this year. To get a taste of what's coming, acquaint yourself with Mark Pinsky's articles 
        [1] 
        [2] 
        [3] 
        [4], also available in our 
        Miscellaneous section.
 Update (04/25) 
         Amazon.com 
         is taking advance orders for the book.
 Update (05/11) The new release date for the book is September 1, 2001.
 
        
        Further Adventures In Collectibles
 By Jouni Paakkinen (jouni@simpsonsarchive.com) - January 28, 2001
 
  "Further Adventures In The Simpsons Collectibles," a sequel to 1998's, The Unauthorized Guide 
        To The Simpsons Collectibles by Robert W. Getz, is about to hit store shelves. The book contains new material, picking up 
        where the previous volume left off, while simultaneously filling some of the gaps. The guide features over 460 new full-color photographs, covering Simpsons collectibles from dolls, figurines, 
        and glasses to games, comics, promos, and beyond.  Information on merchandise that never saw the light of day-- such as Grampa 
        and Otto dolls--is also offered as a special treat for collectors.  Prices for every item also included.
 Further Adventures In The Simpsons Collectibles is the third to be released to the Simpsons collector 
        niche, following Robert W. Getz's first book, and 
        William D. LaRue's 1999 book, "Collecting 
        Simpsons."
 Advanced orders for the book are now being accepted by 
        Amazon.com and other major bookstores.  
        Additionally, signed copies will be available through the author's website.
 
        
        Brush Your Teeth with Milkshakes!
 By Jouni Paakkinen (jouni@simpsonsarchive.com) - January 28, 2001
 Nutritionists claim that the poor eating habits of television characters in popular programs such as 
        The Simpsons have encouraged children to become fat.
 According to a study published in the Journal of the American Dietic Association, 63 episodes of The 
        Simpsons were viewed by researches, who determined that only 20 percent of health-related messages were "positive," or 
        recommendable by health professionals. The most commonly mentioned foods on the show, the researchers said, were beer, 
        fatty snacks and sweets.
 Our favorite family was also criticized for mindless snacking, high-alcohol consumption, the use of 
        food as a bribe or reward and equating weight loss with starvation.
 Australia's Federal Department of Health and Aged Care rushed to dismiss the show's negative influence 
        on children's diets. "Most children see Homer Simpson as a joke character, a slob," said department spokeswoman Kay McNiece.
        "He eats badly, but his behaviour is not seen as something to aspire to."
 Peter Clifton, director of clinical research at CSIRO Health Science and Nutrition, considers 
        "the relentless ads for pizzas and other unhealthy foods" far more hazardous than the television programs themselves. 
        A recent research study by scientists at the University of Newcastle, England, supports Clifton's views, confirming the 
        influence of television advertising upon children.
 Source: The Australian
        (courtesy Pete Escott)
 
 
        
        Bart Drops Pants: Firm Drops Axe
 By Jouni Paakkinen (jouni@simpsonsarchive.com) - January 6, 2001
 Ten employees of the London-based insurance firm 
         Royal & Sun Alliance have been fired for sharing pornographic Simpsons 
         pictures using company e-mail facilities.
 According to The Register, the lewd pictures, which 
         depict characters such as Marge, Ned Flanders, Bart, and Lisa engaged in sexual activity, were distributed 
         internally among colleagues via perpetual message forwarding. 41 staffers received 
         suspensions in mid-December following the material's detection by management -- a 
         total which has since risen to 77.
 In addition to the explicit Simpsons material, obscene pictures of Kermit the Frog and Fozzy 
         Bear were also reportedly included among the circulated materials.
 The incident marks the latest in a growing (and typically caviling) trend of employee 
         termination and disciplinary action for violations of network usage policies in the corporate environment.
 
         |